Feature Requests, Bugs, and More

it should not be so user unfriendly to select a bottle of wine

could it be open sourced if you decide to EOL it?

From Albert Print wine list - I need an option to include only wines in a specific location(s) (like in the web app)

I have tried really hard to get used to the new app. I am the only one that finds every action to be more steps and less intuitive? Adding, consuming, and reporting all seem to be more complicated. As one example, the “add another wine” doesn’t go to the search bar anymore, creating the need for a couple extra clicks to find it. I’ve gone back to the old app and really hope it doesn’t disappear. Anyone else feeling similar or am I just a weirdo?

I couldn’t find a way to add pro reviews on the beta app. (Without a subscription)

iWould like to be able to conduct an inventory using the app. Be able to put it into a mode that i can check off each bottle. I sometimes forget to remove a bottle from my Cellartracker when enjoying multiple bottles in an evening with friends. I realize I can do this the old fashioned way and print it the list and check each one off with a pen.

When adding wines, it would be convenient if the most recently used store (or x number of stores) was on the top of the selection list. What typically happens is that I add multiple different wines from the same store one by one. For each wine I have to select the store from the list anew. If the last used store would be the first in the list, this would ease the process of adding my wines.

steps to reproduce problem: Search a wine that you have > 6 bottles consumed. In my cellar Dolum cask 11Notice that in the results, under My Bottles, the Consumed list is truncated to 6 bottles. There is no way to see the full list of my consumed bottles (so I can see when I consumed each and what’s remaining of these bottles in my cellar). If you try to get the full list by clicking on “View all 12 bottles”, the resulting list just shows all the bottles in my cellar (good), but inexplicably the date of consumption is missing or the consumed bottles (bad). Instead, the results list shows the bottle id of each bottle, which is not particularly meaningful/useful to the user. Please address this problem.

in the legacy app, when you search a wine without specifying the vintage, the result is a list showing ratings of each vintage. Current behavior is a feature take-back. It just shows a list of vintages. User need to click each vintage to get the rating. So it’s much harder to compare vintages and quickly zero in on what’s most desirable. Please fix this feature regression. There are several features like this that keep me going back to Legacy app.

I’m often looking for how much I paid for a bottle, but that number does no longer show up in the new app under valuation. You need to click on “my bottle” and then again on the purchase to see the number. In the old app, “My Price” was listed with the community average and recent WMJ value, which was super useful.

I understand that you a business to run. The new business model that you have introduced is not acceptable for me or any of my friends in Europe/Sweden. There are other alternatives. My suggestion is that you use the data about how people are using the platform and differentiate the model based on usage of different features in the platform. The old model was also a bit challenging given the recommended amount to pay. My suggestion is also to rethink the model and focus more on how to get more people to the platform

In the old legacy version I could search for a wine and the list of vintages and respective scores was easy to view - the new version seems to require selecting the vintage to see the score. Much more effort to quickly view the high scoring vintages. Unless I’m missing something?